<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shooting Wide Open &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killeryellow.com/blog/tag/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killeryellow.com/blog</link>
	<description>a gawker learns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>manipulating images or manipulating your head?</title>
		<link>http://www.killeryellow.com/blog/2009/11/05/manipulating-images-or-manipulating-your-head/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killeryellow.com/blog/2009/11/05/manipulating-images-or-manipulating-your-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Louboutin is an ass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Lauren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killeryellow.com/blog/?p=4559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the Ralph Lauren ad with the scarecrow-like model (who may have actually been fired for being &#8220;overweight&#8221;)? Well, there&#8217;s more where that came from: And in another insane development, can you believe that designer Chrisitan Louboutin thinks Barbie&#8217;s ankles are fat? What?! I thought everyone had pretty much acknowledged that Barbie&#8217;s body is an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Ralph Lauren ad with the scarecrow-like model (who may have actually been <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/was-the-photoshopped-ralph-lauren-model-fired-for-being-overweight-525248/">fired for being &#8220;overweight&#8221;</a>)? Well, there&#8217;s <a href="http://dlisted.com/node/34369">more</a> where that came from:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.killeryellow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ralphlauren.jpg" height=300></p>
<p>And in another insane development, can you believe that designer <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49615&#038;tsp=1">Chrisitan Louboutin thinks Barbie&#8217;s ankles are fat</a>? What?! I thought everyone had pretty much acknowledged that Barbie&#8217;s body is an inhuman idealization, but apparently not even Barbie can escape criticism. Who <i>are</i> these people? Out of touch doesn&#8217;t even come close. They should really just make some robots/real dolls as models. God knows it&#8217;s not like they need any animating human expressions of joy or anything in their ads anyway.</p>
<p>Then of course, there was Glamour&#8217;s use of a <a href="http://jezebel.com/5341749/glamour-shocks-readers-by-featuring-plus+size-models-belly">plus size model</a> in its back pages. Indicative of how messed up the industry is when a normal looking woman is seen by readers as refreshing and shocking.</p>
<p>On a brighter note though, apparently German lifestyle mag Brigette is <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/oct/05/brigitte-german-magazine-bans-models">banning professional models and using real women</a> from now on. Good to see there&#8217;s some backlash against all this, even if it&#8217;s only in Europe so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killeryellow.com/blog/2009/11/05/manipulating-images-or-manipulating-your-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

