Archive | August, 2009

public gathering

18 Aug


Mike Sinclair

Mike Sinclair has been posting new photos from the Missouri State Fair on his blog.

Last Thursday Andrew Hetherington of What’s the Jackonary spoke at the Apple Store in SF. He showed a slideshow of his work – from his early fashion and ad photos to the personal projects (A Room With a View). He also showed a bit of the latest episode of Inside the Photographer’s Studio, featuring Philip Toledano, who is most entertaining. It was nice to see a blogger in person. The setting of the Apple store wasn’t too bad either. There was a small bank of iMacs where little kids were going full stream at RPGs, and the stairs looked like some sort of new age stairway to heaven. Geez, Apple, you’re making everyone else look bad!

An interesting thread in the talk was how the web has changed interaction and community. He mentioned the days when he had a roll of quarters, pager and a phone book instead of a website or blog, and meeting other photographers in the Print Space darkrooms, which were fully booked until the web came along and emptied them. (I wonder if Rayko saw the same drop off). The barrier to entry is lower, so that anyone can publish or show a portfolio, but you have to make a lot more of an effort to interact with others. There is something slightly intimidating about even a blog with a warm personal tone. Where all you had to do really was show up with your warm body and say hi, now you have to email or comment, which feels appropriate only if you have something to say unless you want to annoy. But in the end, maybe it’s not so different, and I’m just finding excuses for my introversion. I suppose it’s the trade-off for the low barrier to entry and the larger network.

Hetherington mentioned that he found in the blogosphere what had ceased to exist at Print Space, but I’m not sure that they are equivalents. If I want to meet working ‘emerging’ photographers online, the content I put online will be seen by them as well as everyone else. In addition to sharing finished work, I’d personally hope to share things that I may in the end decide are not usable, to be a little more open with the process of editing. That of course, is not necessarily what you’d want editors or curators to see. Does this mean you put up a portfolio site geared purely toward career-opportunities and a blog for personal stuff? But of course, editors and curators and whonot also read blogs (a photo editor warns against posting “things that will get you un-hired”). So do photographers who are still learning go to a place like Too Much Chocolate to show unfinished work in “safety?” Everyone knows that there’s much left on the editing room floor, to borrow a phrase from film and sound. Why should it be held against anyone that they are just open about the existence of these items, which can sometimes be illuminating about the work that is shown ‘officially’, about the decisions an artist has made?

I’m coming from a practioner perspective for sure. I can see why it might be too much work for curators and editors to weed out the chaff. Maybe the solution is more ability to filter blogs or streamlike media so that you only see what you’re interested in. I do wish blogs could be more like Facebook, where you can control what types of posts you see, with built in interactivity that news readers don’t have and one main page you can go to to see all sorts of activity. Tumblr comes the closest, but sometimes it’s nice to have the backend power of WordPress. It’s things like this that convince me we are only seeing the tip of the internet iceberg. In 10 years the web will be too so good our little brains can’t even comprehend it now.

where to see the history of photography?

17 Aug


David Trattles

David Trattles shoots in a fairly classic style.

In that vein, a reminder that you have til the end of the week to see Robert Frank’s Americans at SFMOMA. While you’re there, you can check out the Avedon retrospective as well as the double header with Georgia O’Keefe and Ansel Adams. I still have a lot of trouble at retrospective shows with keeping historical context in mind. It’s hard to get excited about Adams, having seen all the derivative work since. Where can I go to see a comprensive chronological history of photography?

I want to see the photo version of an unrealized idea I had for radio which is to play the entire history of music chronologically for an entire week, starting from field recordings of indigenous cultures through various folk music from around the world, to contemporary rock and pop. How great if a museum were to exhibit everything from Daguerre to Shore in one building? It would be a colossal effort, but I would go again and again. As it stands, there seem to be shows of living artists and there seem to be retrospectives but nothing really connecting the two, at least nothing beyond the occasional pairing of giants or contemporaries. The MOMA had a little room at the end of the Frank exhibit showing a few photos from his influences, but nothing extensive.

With a chronological showing, you could change the way people move through a gallery by drawing little colored lines on the walls for viewers to follow from artists to their influences and mentees. I like the idea of a museum as a playground where you run back and forth, where there is a sense of trying to follow clues, literally following a thread on the wall, or find things for yourself. Or this could be done with handheld devices that you can punch the number of an artwork into. It would then show you the numbers of relevent other works. Or, how about this for audience participation – viewers can program their own edited sequence of themed or related photos on the device and upload it into a database where others can download them. The museum curators could then pick one to feature each week. This could work well on the web too. I’d settle for a web version of this if the real thing is too difficult, but I assume that with copyright issues, it’s not something just anyone can decide to put together. Too bad.

Anyhow, I digress. A neat little video you should be sure to see while you’re gorging yourself on black and white photography is Joe Sola’s Studio Visit, which is a part of the Studio Sessions exhibit. He invites visitors to his studio to see a new piece and then… gives them a little surprise. Most of the time when I see a pair of headphones hanging next to a not so captivating video, it feels like an obligation to put on the phones and hear what’s going on, but in this case, it worked perfectly with the presentation. You see strange things going on in the video and cannot wait to hear what’s going on. I was suprised by flat most of the on camera responses were! I wish he hadn’t given them the “do not be alarmed” warning. (Would not doing so count as unethically putting them under undue stress?) You have to see it for yourself, but here is a not so subtle hint:

Radiohead: it’s official

17 Aug


Donwood/Tchock

It’s official. You can download “These Are My Twisted Words” directly from Radiohead’s WASTE store for free as a zip file with artwork and a bit of credit text.

weekend silliness: a new Radiohead song

14 Aug


Donwood/Tchock

This week the weekend silliness comes a bit before the weekend because I can’t contain my excitement about how Radiohead released its newest song. So I offer this up now and will say a few words about Andrew Hetherington’s talk in SF yesterday next week. (I admit I like having a little time to digest.) Read on even if you’re not a Radiohead fan – I think the music industry got an early start on what the photography/editorial world is going through. There’s a lesson about the nature of the internet and digital media in here somewhere. Grab a sammich, this is a chock-full long ‘un…

A little before 11pm GMT Wednesday night, a user named “crza” uploaded a song titled “These Are My Twisted Words” to the invite-only torrent site What.CD and it wasn’t long before someone noticed it and posted the discovery to the messageboards at the fansite At Ease. Pretty soon the likes of Rolling Stone and Pitchfork had picked it up off the fan boards, as they’re wont to do since Radiohead doesn’t tend to go through the press when they pull these stunts. Sirius even played it.

What’s interesting to me is that not only was this an internet release but it wasn’t even really handled by the band. They simply let it loose on a p2p network and rabid fans dug it up, spread it all over the net. They didn’t have to handle bandwidth, hosting, anything. There was no need for any semblance of “officialness.” I’m not sure that it could be called a proper leak since all evidence seems to indicate that it was an intentional act, not the least of which is the fact that the band has not come out and refuted anything. More telling is a .nfo text/info file included with the mp3 (a habit in the scene groups?) held a message in Yorke’s characteristically cryptic manner that seems to suggest that something will happen this upcoming Monday. Rumored distribution of a new EP? Official release of the track?


Jonny Greenwood (? inferred)

Some comments Yorke made about mysterious future plans and being sick of lengthy albums in the current issue of the Believer suggest it’s very possible:

There’s a process of natural selection going on right now. The music business was waiting to die in its current form about twenty years ago. But then, hallelujah, the CD turned up and kept it going for a bit. So you have this top-heavy infrastructure. The press is top-heavy in the same way. You think, Why are these people surviving? Well, because they can just start reissuing the back catalog. The majors used to put huge pressure on us and everyone to put extra stuff at the end – give the shop something extra to sell. As if your forty minutes of blood and sweat isn’t enough. They were charging too much for the CD – they knew it, and they were trying to justify it with extra stuff.

[Bonus: NY Times piece sent around our station lists noting the "shift in media consumption by young people" from "an acquisition model to an access model."]

I’m not very interested in the album at the moment. I’ve got this running joke: Mr. Tanaka runs this magazine in Japan. He always says to me, “EPs next time?” And I say yes, and he says, “Bullshit.” But I think really, this time, it could work. None of us want to go into that creative hoo-ha of a long-play record again. Not straight off. It worked with In Rainbows because we had a real fixed idea about where we were going. But we’ve all said that we can’t possibly dive into that again.

It’s also linked up to this whole thing about what is the band, what is the method of how we get together and work. Jonny and I have talked about sitting down and writing songs for orchestra and orchestrating it fully and then doing a live take of it and that’s it – finished. We’ve always wanted to do it, but we’ve never done it because we’re always taking songs that haven’t been written for that, and then trying to adapt them. With things like that, you think, Do you want to do a whole record like that? Or do you just want to get stuck into it for a bit and see how it feels?

[Bonus: The Australian interviews Jonny Greenwood about his work with the BBC Orchestra.]

We’ve actually got a really good plan, but I can’t tell you what it is, because someone will rip it off. But we’ve got this great idea for putting things out. In a physical realm and a digital realm.


Donwood/Tchock

As you might remember, they released their last album, In Rainbows, online in that reviled pay what you like scheme. The criticism that I keep hearing, from critics as well as other musicians (Sonic Youth even), is that this sort of model is only viable if you’ve already got a good sized fan base. This is true, but it’s a terrible criticism that amounts to arguing that groups with the means to take on interesting projects shouldn’t because the rest of us can’t. What, we shouldn’t enourage people to construct gigantic spiders (see Conscientious, which you should donate to now that Joerg has put up a Paypal button) in the name of art because not many people can afford it?! That’s crap!

They’ve never shied away from stating that they made the choice to go down this road with financial considerations in mind, as everyone always does.

It also worked as a way of using the Internet to promote your record, without having to use iTunes or Google or whatever. You rely on the fact that you know a lot of people want to hear it. You don’t want to have to go to the radio first and go through all that bullshit about what’s the first single. You don’t want to have to go to the press. That was my thing, I am not giving it to the press two months early so they can tear it to shreds and destroy it for people before they’ve even heard it. And it worked on that level. And it also worked financially.

Some seem to take this to mean that it’s all a clever pseudo-viral marketing ploy. Which, I suppose, it is, but I think they forget that for a fan, the excitement is real and it’s centered on the music, not the product release. Before each release there is a frenzy of anticipation on the fan boards, even if it is a few hundred dedciated fans, a small portion of whom are obsessed that they are willing to transcribe archived audio interviews, make screen captures of user crza’s profile before it was hidden from public view, and reference webcomics that might be a source of the phrase used in the .nfo. Without the net, all these little bits of detective work would be ridiculous, not to mention virtually impossible in a short span of time, but it’s put up in public view, it takes on museum-like qualities, doesn’t it? And personally, I like that there’s an element of participation and effort to it, that you don’t necessarily just have to wait to be told. It’s an insane form of crowdsourcing energy that the band is exploiting (if that’s possibly the right word) for the public’s benefit.

Yorke talks more about the motivations behind the earlier release in the interview, but the Believer has pointedly not leaked the entirety of the article into the ether, so I’ll refrain from providing you complete contraband goods. Suffice it to say if you really determined to read the rest of it for free, you can figure out where from the sites I’ve mentioned. He also talks seriously about their efforts to contain the environmental damage of large international tours, the destroyed lightrails of LA and the need to make changes at the level of infrastructure, which only government can do efficaciously. It’s a good read, and it’s also the summer music issue that comes with a CD, so it might be worth picking up anyway.

So what all of this comes down to is that you can take a listen to the mp3 without guilt. I’ve recompressed it quite a bit to make it smaller, but it shouldn’t be noticeable unless you’re an audiophile. As for the song itself, it sounds like they’re getting a little more low key in their “old” age, but that signature mood is still there, so I like it.

Incidentally, to echo an earlier post, Radiohead and Stanley Donwood, the artist they collab with, are also a little obsessed with suburbia (all the visuals in this post were included as extras on the second In Rainbows disc):


Donwood/Tchock

gimme the iArt, the holographic photos

12 Aug


David Teter (+ Flickr)

Both these photos were shot on an iPhone. Phone cam art is already happening, but I wonder when it’ll reached critical mass and become par for the course. This week I’ve been finding photography on Flickr that I really like. It’s ridiculous to expect too much from Flickr, which is best for socializing and interaction, but once you’ve found a few good photographers, you fall into a comfy group of people you admire. Someone commented in a discussion thread that bashing Flickr is like insulting the phone book, and I have to agree. All kinds live on Flickr.


David Teter

While we’re on tech, over the weekend, it occurred to me that the next big photographic revolution will likely be holographic cameras, 3D photography. You can already buy holographic photos and videos done basically with a stereoscopic or multi-camera / multi-angle set-up. Remember CNN’s election night faux-holographic coverage? Is it physically possible to produce true holograms from a single camera with a single-click? Some brief googling turned up a patent for a digital holographic camera filed by a Stanford professor who runs a laser lab.

From the description:

The holographic recording subsystem of the present invention can comprise, for example, a low-power laser and a spatial-light modulator. Multiple holograms can be recorded. The storage device may take the form of a monolithic card. The removable holographic storage device can be transferred to a dedicated reader. The reader can connect to a computer as a peripheral device or may be integrated into a computer. The reader can also be integrated directly into other devices, such as a printer dedicated to printing out photographs.

From a user’s perspective, the digital holographic camera of the present invention can operate in a manner similar to a conventional film camera. The capacity of each cartridge can be based on current film packaging, which emphasizes film speed and count. For example, cartridges can be differentiated according to resolution in a manner similar to the distinction between high-speed and low-speed film. By providing predetermined picture counts, e.g. 24 or 36, required capacity is based on count and resolution.

This was in 2002. You’ve gotta figure someone’s closer to cracking this nut by now.

let me entertain you

11 Aug

A little while ago, when I was getting into the subway downtown, I saw this. When I read it, I think instead, “LET US PERFORM A FRONTAL LOBOTOMY ON YOU.” It comes across as a command or a threat, not an offer, which would probably still be disturbing considering Vegas is a mash of casinos, strip clubs and Celine Dion concerts. I’m not sure it’s my idea of all-caps entertainment…

I know that the word “infotainment” has been around for a while now, but yesterday I heard it used by an educational organization in reference to themselves – “go to our website to be infotained.” I’m all for education that is informative yet fun, but something about that just seems a little wrong.

After I got off the subway, there was kitsch galore:

All of these paintings depict the same couple in various states of female helplessness and male strength. Aside from the inexplicable and apparently constant demand for car charger devices, I was also confused by the juxtaposition of the noble savage and WWF wrestlers. On second thought though, it makes perfect sense.

Kirill Kuletski

10 Aug


Kirill Kuletski

Kirill Kuletski’s website is very minimal, I kid you not, but there is a lot more on Flickr. Most are found interiors and exteriors, I’m particularly curious about his new work in progress (second photo shown) which seems to be about some sort of mining operation in the Ukraine where the workers sleep underground.

weekend silliness: Aesop’s crows

9 Aug

Clever Crows Prove Aesop’s Fable Is More Than Fiction:

Researchers presented four crows with a challenge from Aesop’s fable “The Crow and the Pitcher”: a container of water not quite full enough for the birds to reach with their beaks. Just like Aesop’s crow, all four birds figured out how to raise the water level by dropping stones into the glass. The crows also selectively chose large pebbles over small ones, and quickly realized that dropping rocks into a container of sawdust didn’t have the same effect.

(Thank, Danielle!)

Beatrix Reinhardt

7 Aug


Beatrix Reinhardt

I’d hoped for some explanation of Coca-Cola houses in India. Are these salvaged billboards? Or is Coca-Cola actually paying for or providing these paint jobs and signs?

suburbia

6 Aug


Justin James Reed‘s New Cities


Kirk CrippensForeclosure, USA


Andrew PhelpsHigley

Jeff Brouws delivered a lecture at the SPE conference in Dallas in March, and American Suburb X recently published a transcript: “It Don’t Exist”, The Impact of Sprawl and Suburban Build-out on Inner City America. It is a great read. He discusses transportation infrastructure and different zones – industrial, commercial, residential. Here’s an excerpt on the development of the highway system and the implications of the integrated garage:

Prior to the 1930s there was no organized infrastructure of highways across America; unmarked roads and scarce services for the motorist were the norm.

When Eisenhower signed into law the The National Interstate and Defense Highways Act in 1956, construction of a freeway system linking all major cities began, fueled by this idea of growth. In this way, decentralization became a guiding principle for not only developers who owned land on the periphery they wished to sell, but for a federal government who in the final analysis thought a low-density lifestyle, dispersed population and scattered infrastructure would be less vulnerable to a paralyzing nuclear attack.

Notice the garage integrated right into the design of the house; this type of home reinforced individual automobile usage and discourage pedestrian activity; people could drive right into their home without interacting with their environment, which is totally different then living in the city.

He also mentions why corporate chains, with Walmart as an especially egregious offender, are bad for local economies.

Historically, locally owned downtown businesses paid local taxes; money generated from that business stayed in town and re-circulated there. With sprawl and the growth of multinational chains the majority of what you spend at Wal-Mart today gets sent back home to a out-of-state home office or funneled through tax shelters in Michigan, Delaware or Nevada — states that charge no corporate income tax.

I wonder why more books like, say, What’s the Matter With Kansas don’t include photography. Is it out of some ridiculous belief that adults don’t look at books with pictures in them? That reading books with pictures in them makes you a simpleton who can’t understand the words without the pictures? Too bad. There’s the reading about the Walmart’s slow community attrition and then there’s seeing photos of a small town transformed in a decade because a Walmart moved in. Maybe I am a simpleton, but it’s just easier to believe it when you see it. It’s like standing there in person, right?